It is easy to think trilogies are a modern phenomenon with books like The Hunger Games, Divergence, Twilight and His Dark Materials, but from the birth of the novel in the 18th Century books were commonly written in three volumes. What makes a great trilogy, is when they are joined they form a logical progression, yet they can still reach a satisfying conclusion individually. This is where the wheels start to come off slightly for me.
I loved Northern Lights and I can see why it was the only one made into a film (The Golden Compass). This book has great characters in Iorek Byrnison, the noble, loyal, faithful bear whose steadfastness spans the length of the series. He is Lyra’s rock and arguably more dependable than her parents who seem more obsessed with their own scientific discoveries than taking care of a child. Even The Subtle Knife was interesting as it extended the idea of other worlds and dimensions. Evil, which was more subtle and sinister in the first book, now becomes more pronounced. Those who wish to steal for their own gains, to be in control and manipulate others. We see both science and spirituality. Mary is a scientist looking at dark matter, what Lyra calls dust. The angels are sent to help the shaman, Will’s father, and later to help Will. Where things fall most dramatically apart is with the final book The Amber Spyglass. Here the author tries to add not only good and evil, spirituality and science, but Greek Myth and a form of nihilism together with creatures who biologically speaking don’t seem able to stand. I understand the abyss, from dust you came and to dust you return, but leave spirituality out of it, for me it just muddies the waters.
There are extensive references and quotes to literary sources and especially Milton’s Paradise Lost and perhaps if I had read this, the final book may have made more logical sense. However, if like Lewis Carrol this is a book aimed at children, how many are going to have read Paradise Lost. I think Mr Pullman should leave spirituality to C S Lewis.
4 thoughts on “Darker and more bizarre towards the end”
I think when an author seems to change significantly by the last book in a trilogy, a reader will feel as if the rug had been pulled out, and that the set is inconsistent.
Everything the author can do to 1) provide at least some hints of what’s coming, and 2) to make the progression between the books both obvious and clear, is a big help to readers.
I loved Dune. I was happy with Children of Dune. I was still doing well with Dune Messiah. But when Frank Herbert started wandering very far afield, I had a problem seeing where we were headed, and it seemed a bit more like milking all the possibilities, rather than part of a plan. And I won’t read the books not written by him – even if his son was very well prepared. But I didn’t see the development of a plan that would make me want to read every one of the books after the third.
I still love the first three (and have read SOME of the others).
That is so spooky I’ve just bought the Dune trilogy on special offer. I read the first a long time ago and kept meaning to go back to it. Now I just need the time to fit it in.
I am having issues checking out your site. I cannot find any information pertaining to your book. I hope you can offer me some help. Sorry to bother you.
lsarkard AT gmail.com
Apologies they are all on Amazon, perhaps I should put a link on the site!